Chapter 4 – Making Light Work Harder in Biology 135
diffusing molecule types. However, the main weakness of FCS is its relative insensitivity to
changes in molecular weight, Mw. Different types of biomolecules can differ relatively mar
ginally in terms of Mw; however, the “on” time τ scales approximately with the frictional
drag of the molecule, roughly as the effective Stokes radius, which scales broadly as ~
/
Mw
1 3 .
Therefore, FCS is poor at discriminating different types of molecules unless the difference in
Mw is at least a factor of ~4.
FCS can also be used to measure molecular interactions between molecules. Putatively,
interacting molecules are labeled using different colored fluorophores, mostly dual-color
labeling with two-color detector channels to monitor interacting pairs of molecules. A variant
of standard FCS called “fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy” can then be applied.
A modification of this technique uses dual-color labeling but employing just one detector
channel, which captures intensity only when the two separately labeled molecules are close
enough to be interacting, known as FRET-FCS.
4.4.3 FCS ON MORE COMPLEX SAMPLES
FCS can also be performed on live-cell samples. By scanning the sample through the confocal
volume, FCS can generate a 2D image map of mobility parameters across a sample. This has
been utilized to measure the variation in diffusion coefficient across different regions of large
living cells. As with scanning confocal microscopy, the scanning speed is a limiting factor.
However, these constraints can be overcome significantly by using a spinning-disk system.
FCS measurements can also be combined with simultaneous topography imaging using AFM
(see Chapter 6). For example, it is possible to monitor the formation and dynamics of putative
lipid rafts (see Chapter 2) in artificial lipid bilayers using such approaches (Chiantia, 2007).
Worked Case Example 4.3: Localization Microscopy
A time-correlated PALM experiment was performed on live E. coli bacteria stuck to cover
slip to track a protein known to incorporate into liquid–liquid phased separated droplets
in the cytoplasm whose formation was triggered by stressing the cell using a toxin.
The droplet protein was tagged with a red photoactivatable fluorescent protein called
PAmCherry, which was stochastically activated using low intensity 405 nm wavelength
laser excitation and imaged using a high intensity 561 nm wavelength laser excitation in
narrow-field mode, peak fluorescence wavelength 595 nm, using a 1.4 NA oil immersion
(refractive index =1.515) objective lens to track individual molecules with sampling time of
5 ms per consecutive image frame. Once fluorescence light from the PAmCherry had been
captured by the objective lens, only ~30% was transmitted through all of the imaging
system to the entrance of the camera detector. The camera detector had a quantum effi
ciency of 80% at a wavelength of 595 nm. The average effector diameter of the droplet
protein tagged with PAmCherry is ~2–3 nm.
a
If the PAmCherry emits ~105 fluorescent photons prior photobleaching on average
resulting in single-molecule tracks of average duration ~50 ms under these narrow-
field conditions, estimate the localization precision when using a 2D Gaussian fitting
to track single molecules in the microscope focal plane, if you assume that the effect
from non-photon sources on localization precision is negligible.
b
By increasing the intensity of the 405 nm wavelength activation laser the number
of tracks detected increased, but also in some cases the brightness of tracks was
twice that detected at the lower excitation intensity. Offer an explanation for these
observations and estimate the smallest diameter of droplet that could be detected
under these conditions. What does that imply in terms of the smallest droplet we can
detect and the maximum number of proteins within it?
c
Under the lower intensity activation laser setting, a plot of the average mean squared
displacement versus time interval for all detected tracks was initially a straight
KEY BIOLOGICAL
APPLICATIONS: FCS
Quantifying molecular mobility;
Determining molecular
interactions.